Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 2003No. 1-02-0815 RelPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GORDON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Daven Curtis, filed a four-count complaint against defendants, Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and Jeanne Butler, a CTA employee, on March 22, 2000, seeking damages for a traffic collision involving her car and a CTA bus driven by defendant Butler. The CTA ultimately moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to section 2 — 619 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619 (West 2000)), arguing that plaintiff’s notice under section 41 of the Metropolitan Transit Authority Act (the Transit Act) (70 ILCS 3605/41 (West…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Saragusa v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fujimura v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Joseph v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Niziolek v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Curtis v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API