Legal Opinion

Desaulnier v. Desaulnier

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 2, 1951No. 4028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

A legal separation in this state, originally authorized by Laws 1909, c. 68, has “the effect of a divorce” only to the extent provided by statute and is synonymous with a limited divorce. Veino v. Veino, 96 N. H. 439, 440. A legal separation differs from an absolute divorce (R. L., c. 339, s. 6) in that the parties are not “free to marry any third person” (R. L., c. 339, s. 24), the name of the wife cannot be changed (s. 25) and the parties may at any time resume marital relations after filing a written declaration of such resumption with the Clerk of the Superior Court for the county in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cochrane v. CochraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petition of Gregory MalisosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. Rodrique v. RodriqueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API