Thomas v. Hansen
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
There are four issues in this workers’ compensation appeal. The district court affirmed the industrial commissioner’s award of benefits but, reversing a contrary agency decision, determined the award was not subject to indemnity rights. We affirm the allowance of benefits but reverse the district court’s disallowance of indemnity.
Respondents are Kenneth Hansen d/b/a Hansen & Sons Welding (Hansen) and Le-Mars Mutual Insurance Company, Hansen’s workers’ compensation insurer (LeMars). Petitioner Edward R. Thomas, the injured worker, was not directly employed by Hansen. Thomas was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lauhoff Grain Co. v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Shirley v. PothastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Bond v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Fisher v. Keller Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Farm-Fuel Products Corp. v. Grain Processing Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Veasley v. CRST International Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Smith v. CRST International Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- Kohout v. Bennett Constr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Bankers Standard Insurance Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Firstar Bank Sioux City, N.A. v. Beemer Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.