Legal Opinion

Shirley v. Pothast

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 24, 1993No. 92-1221PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

This dispute concerns the indemnity rights of intervenors, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company and Waterloo Chamber of Commerce (“Aetna”), with respect to a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Jeff Shirley, an injured worker, on his third-party tort claim, against defendant, Kenneth Pothast (“Po-thast”). Judgment was also entered in favor of plaintiffs, Kathy, Cari, Steffanie, and Adam Shirley, on their claims for lost spousal and parental consortium, against the same defendant. Aetna intervened in the Shirleys’ action seeking indemnity from any recovery obtained by Jeff…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Iowa Fuel & Minerals, Inc. v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Tigges v. City of AmessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Jansen v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  4. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Hawkeye State Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Sheer Construction, Inc. v. W. Hodgman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Walker v. GribbleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Phipps v. Winneshiek CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. Rick v. SpragueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Horsman v. WahlSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Hughes v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API