People v. Sebring
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to superior court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J.) Respondent was convicted of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than the crime of murder. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The respondent in this case was charged with the crime of assault with intent to do great bodily harm.
*706Annie Sebring, his wife, made the complaint against him, before Judge Holmes, in the police court in Grand Rapids, and therein charged that the respondent assaulted the complainant with a knife, doing her great bodily injury, whereby her life was endangered, and that he did the same with the felonious intent to commit the crime charged.
The respondent was arrested upon the charge, examined before Judge Holmes, and bound over to appear in the superior court of that city for trial upon an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parsons v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. StickleMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. HamacherMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.