Legal Opinion

Horgan v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1930No. 28,030PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. The action is one to recover damages for a mistake and error of the registrar of titles in entering upon a certificate of title and duplicate a memorial of the purport of a mortgage on registered land.

The Eoscoe Eealty Company owned the real estate in question and caused the same ,to be registered in its name on March 15, 1926, under the registration act and received the proper duplicate certificate of title, in April, 1926, the company mortgaged the property to Union Trust Company to secure payment of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Prouty v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. In Re Application of SeickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horgan v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API