Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Horgan v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1930No. 28,030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 233 N.W. 866. Defendant appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. The action is one to recover damages for a mistake and error of the registrar of titles in entering upon a certificate of title and duplicate a memorial of the purport of a mortgage on registered land.

The Roscoe Realty Company owned the real estate in question and caused the same to be registered in its name on March 15, 1926, under the registration act and received the proper duplicate certificate of title. In April, 1926, the company mortgaged the property to Union Trust…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Douglas v. WestfallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Prouty v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Baart v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  4. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. In Re Application of SeickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  2. State v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. State v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. First Trust Co. v. Commonwealth Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. State v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API