Legal Opinion

Cavazos v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1979No. 1508PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a workmen’s compensation stroke case. During the trial and at the close of Cavazos (claimant’s) evidence, the court withdrew the case from the jury and instructed a take nothing verdict in favor of the Fidelity & Casualty Company (carrier). Claimant contends the trial court erred in granting Carrier’s Motion for Instructed Verdict because the evidence presented material issues which should have been submitted to the trier of facts. We affirm.

Up to the time of trial claimant had been employed as a locksmith for the past 26 years. His job as a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Triangle Motors of Dallas v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Henderson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Najera v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Olson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Anderson v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
  2. Parks v. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  3. Blair v. INA of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
  4. Torres v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Christopher Leigh John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc. and Harrison County Hospital Association, Inc., D/B/A Marshall Regional Medical Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API