Legal Opinion

Torres v. Chrysler Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1983No. 2440cvPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

Antonio Torres, together with his wife and children, sued the Chrysler Credit Corporation for wrongful repossession of their van. Upon the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict. We affirm.

The Torres family alleged in their petition that Mr. Torres and Chrysler entered a retail installment contract for the purchase of the van; that Mr. Torres complied with the contract terms by making fifteen monthly payments; that the van was seized by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) the day after…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Hamilton v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Goldring v. GoldringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Cavazos v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Hotchkiss v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. United States Trust Co. of New York, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Karl B. Bailey v. MidFirst Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API