Weiss v. Kling
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
The defendant, in his motion for a directed verdict, on which motion his motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto1 was based, contended that the evidence did not authorize a verdict for the plaintiff on the prayers of her petition.
The evidence authorized a finding that a trespass on the plaintiff’s property had taken place, that several of the plaintiff’s trees had been cut down, and that the plaintiff’s property had been damaged by such trespass in at least the amount of the verdict returned by the jury. Therefore, the question presented is whether the defendant is liable in law for this…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yearwood v. PeabodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Liberty Lumber Co. v. SilasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Bentley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Banks v. Ellijay Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hodges v. Doctors HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Buchanan v. Canada Dry Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Stafford Enterprises, Inc. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Asbury v. PUBLIC SERVICE &C. INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.