Legal Opinion

Yearwood v. Peabody

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1932No. 21981PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “The employer generally is not responsible for torts committed by his employee when the latter exercises an independent business, and in it is not subject to the immediate direction and control of the employer.” Civil Code (1910), § 4414. The term “independent business,” as used in this section of the code, must necessarily be taken to mean a business or employment separate and independent from the business of the employer. The fact that such employee might not be generally engaged in the particular business or occupation carried on by him under his special contract with the employer would…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Florida Railroad v. KimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Quinan v. Standard Fuel Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  4. Home Accident Insurance v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Irving v. Home Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Bentley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Golosh v. Cherokee Cab CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Blair v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Banks v. Ellijay Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API