Legal Opinion

Cady v. Doxtator

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1916No. Docket No. 136PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Wayne,; Hally, J. Case by Guy B. Cady against Charles H. Doxtator and another for damage to plaintiff’s automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

On Sunday evening, November 8, 1914, plaintiff’s automobile was standing in front of his residence in the city of Detroit. While in that position it was run into and damaged by defendant Doxtator’s automobile. Doxtator was not with his automobile at the time. It was being driven by his brother-in-law, Harry Benzing, who resided with him, and was in his employ, and who is also made a defendant. It is the claim of defendant Doxtator that defendant Benzing was at the time driving his automobile without his knowledge or consent. . Judgment having passed against the defendant in both the justice’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owens v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Bullard v. BullardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Merrill v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Churchill v. WhiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Beals v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fuller v. King (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Slocum v. Ford Motor CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Monaghan v. PavsnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Schwartz v. TriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API