Legal Opinion

Bullard v. Bullard

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 19, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Gourt. — IIon. Henry Bank, Jr,,. Judge. Action in equity to have a bill of sale absolute on its-face declared to be a chattel mortgage, and for an accounting. There was a decree for defendant, after which the court sustained a motion for a new trial, from which order the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Granger, O. J.

*4251 *424The defendant, E. G. Bullard, is the administrator of the estate of James Bullard, who was the-original defendant in the suit, and who 'died pending the motion for a new trial, after which E. G. Bullard was substituted as his legal representative. In May, 1894, the plaintiff made to James Bullard an absolute bill of sale of two stallions, the consideration in the bill of sale being $2,500. This suit was commenced in August, 1896, and by the petition it is made to appear that about May 10, 1894,, *425plaintiff agreed with James Bullard for a loan of $1,250,. to secure which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murray v. WeberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Means Bros. v. YeagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Boggess v. ReadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Allen v. Barrett & CarltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. Eckel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Henderson v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Guth v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Mitchell v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API