Legal Opinion

California Union Insurance v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1960No. Civ. 24565PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem. *

Petitioners, an employer and its compensation carrier, by writ of review, seek annulment of the orders and decision on reconsideration of the Industrial Accident Commission allowing reimbursement to an injured employee for costs of certain self-procured surgical and hospital treatment.

We previously ordered that writ of review issue on the ground that the employer’s and carrier’s petition therefor seemed to raise substantial questions as to whether the employer, under the circumstances here presented, was legally liable for the reasonable expense incurred by the employee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Columbia - Geneva Steel Division v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Draney v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Leadbettor v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Pacific Electric Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Henson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Department of Employment v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API