Legal Opinion
Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1961No. Civ. 25076PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOURSE, J. pro tem. *
By its petition herein Industrial Indemnity Company seeks to annul an award made by the respondent commission after reconsideration by which petitioner is ordered to pay to applicant the amounts expended by him for self-procured medical treatment.
The facts here are not in dispute. They are: In October 1956 and February 1957 the applicant, Joseph H. Estill, sustained injuries to his back. Petitioner was the compensation insurance carrier of Estill’s employer. It voluntarily paid temporary disability indemnity after the October injury and furnished medical treatment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Iron Works v. Industrial Accident CommisionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission & SeaquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Columbia - Geneva Steel Division v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Leadbettor v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- McCoy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Bear Bros., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Lasiter v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.