Legal Opinion

Willoughby Hills Dev. & Distrib., Inc. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2018No. 2016-1137PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

*277 {¶ 1} Appellant, Willoughby Hills Development and Distribution, Inc. ("WHDD"), appeals a Board of Tax Appeals ("BTA") decision that affirmed appellee tax commissioner's denial of WHDD's request for a commercial-activity-tax ("CAT") refund. Subject to certain exclusions, the CAT is levied on each person or entity with taxable gross receipts above a certain threshold for the privilege of doing business in Ohio. See R.C. 5751.01 et seq. The issue here involves whether WHDD can meet the requirements of a gross-receipts exclusion that applies when a person or entity acts as an agent for *838 another.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Satullo v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sizemore v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kerans v. Porter Paint Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Damon's Missouri, Inc. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Parisi v. Dayton Bar Assn. Certified Grievance Commt. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Weidman v. HildebrandtOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Aramark Corp. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Gibson Bros., Inc. v. Oberlin CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Aramark Corp. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API