Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Lee

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1936No. 29486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

There was an accident at or near a street intersection in. the city of Omaha, in which the plaintiff, a woman 44 years of age, a pedestrian, was struck and injured by an automobile driven by the defendant. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, in an action for damages, the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict because the plaintiff had failed to establish any act of negligence on the part of the defendant.

The record is a short one and easily and quickly examined. As it stands, the plaintiff and another woman alighted from a south-bound street car, waited for it to pass,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roth v. BlomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Kelly v. GagnonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Adamek v. TilfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Lammers v. CarstensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Redwelski v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hardung v. SheldonNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Doan v. HoppeNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API