Legal Opinion

Lammers v. Carstensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1922No. 22166PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

Alphonse Lammers, the plaintiff, brou'ght. this action against the defendant, Hans Carstensen, to recover damages to the plaintiff’s automobile, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant, which respited *476in a collision between the automobiles of the respective parties. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

The errors relied upon for a reversal of the case are: That the verdict is against the testimony; that it was rendered in disregard of the court’s instructions; and that the court erred in failing to give an instruction asked…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Murray Ex Rel. Murray v. Pearson Appliance StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stark v. TurnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Roby v. AukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. McClelland v. Interstate Transit LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Burhoop v. BrackhanNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API