Legal Opinion

United States v. Kunkle

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 12, 1987No. 52,875; ACM S26672PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

Appellant was tried by a special court-martial and, pursuant to his pleas, was found guilty of wrongfully possessing methamphetamine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. He was sentenced to a bad-*214conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, partial forfeitures, and reduction to E-l. After all the intermediate reviewing authorities had upheld his conviction and sentence, we granted review to consider whether appellant’s guilty pleas were improvident.

We now affirm.

I

During appellant’s providence inquiry, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. La PellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Hines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Carey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. FlanniganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. FloydU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. AngoneArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  5. United States v. AngoneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API