United States v. Kunkle
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
Appellant was tried by a special court-martial and, pursuant to his pleas, was found guilty of wrongfully possessing methamphetamine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a. He was sentenced to a bad-*214conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, partial forfeitures, and reduction to E-l. After all the intermediate reviewing authorities had upheld his conviction and sentence, we granted review to consider whether appellant’s guilty pleas were improvident.
We now affirm.
I
During appellant’s providence inquiry, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- People v. La PellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Hines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Carey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. AsfeldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. FlanniganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. FloydU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. AngoneArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. AngoneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002