Legal Opinion

Denson v. Denson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1961No. 386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

An examination of the complaint filed in this action reveals that it was not alleged therein that plaintiff was a resident of Davidson County, but instead, “That the plaintiff is now and has been for more than six months a resident of the State of North Carolina * * *.”

Therefore, the appropriate issue in light of the pleadings should have read: Has the plaintiff been a resident of the State of North Carolina for more than six months next preceding the commencement of this action? No issue as to whether the plaintiff was or was not a resident of Davidson County was raised by the pleadings.

It…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Davis v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bruce v. BruceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API