Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Stokes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

Ia the absence of fraud, ttthe Superior Court of any county in North Oaroliona has jurisdiction of an action for divorce if either of the parties is domiciled in this State. The provisions of G.S. 50-3 that in divorce proceedings the summons shall be returnable to the court of the county in which either the plaintiff or defendant resides are not jurisdictional; they relate only to venue. Denson v. Denson, 255 N.C. 703, 122 S.E. 2d 507; Nelms v. Nelms, 250 N.C. 237, 108 S.E. 2d 529; Smith v. Smith, 226 N.C. 506, 39 S.E. 2d 391. However, if a plaintiff should fraudulently conceal his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Nelms v. NelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Denson v. DensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API