Legal Opinion

Newsome v. Thompson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 5, 1990No. 1-88-3126PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Plaintiff, Eldrit Newsome, filed an action to recover for personal injuries sustained when the automobile of defendant Senator Thompson collided with plaintiff’s motorcycle. Defendant City of Chicago (the City) filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action. The trial court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals.

Count I of plaintiff’s amended complaint alleged that while operating a motorcycle in a northerly direction on Vincennes Avenue in the City on September 12, 1987, he was struck, at approximately 10833 South Vincennes, by the automobile of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lindenmier v. City of RockfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. Janssen v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Horrell v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Ross v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. West v. KirkhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Munizza v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Wood v. Village of GrayslakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Parsons v. Carbondale TownshipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Santelli v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API