Legal Opinion
In Re Smmd
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 2012No. 55541PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
272 P.3d 126 (2012)
In the Matter of Parental Rights as to S.M.M.D. and T.A.D.
Raena R., Appellant,
v.
State of Nevada; Ted R.; and Raelynn R., Respondents.
No. 55541.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
January 26, 2012.
Donald K. Pope, Reno, for Appellant.
Catherine Cortez Masto, Attorney General, and Sharon L. Benson, Deputy Attorney General, Carson City, for Respondent State of Nevada.
Ernest E. Adler, Carson City, for Respondents Ted R. and Raelynn R.
Before the Court En Banc.
OPINION
By the Court, PICKERING, J.:
This appeal requires us to decide whether, under section 1919 of the Indian Child Welfare Act…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- HAMMER v. STATESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022