Legal Opinion

Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Eveland

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 3, 1922No. 107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, District Judge

(in memorandum). In Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company, Plaintiff, v. H. L. Eveland, Hugh Smith, and H. C. Preston, Constituting the Tax Commission of the State of South Dakota et al., Defendants, I have determined to deny the motion of the defendants to dismiss the bill of complaint. In this motion counsel for defendants contend that this court is without jurisdiction, assuming that there is.an adequate remedy at law. On the other hand, counsel for plaintiff urges that there is no adequate remedy at law, and further that a multiplicity of suits would result, and that federal questions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. SalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Louisville & N. R. v. BosworthDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Adams CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1932
  3. Liberty Coal Co. v. BassettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Connor v. Board of Com'rs of Logan County, OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1926
  5. Wrigley Pharmaceutical Co. v. CameronDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API