Legal Opinion

Wrigley Pharmaceutical Co. v. Cameron

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1926No. 481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

On October 1, 1925, the plaintiffs filed their amended Ml in equity to restrain the defendants, officers of the state of Pennsylvania, from instituting and prosecuting any civil or criminal actions against plaintiffs under the provisions of the Securities Act of Pennsylvania (Pa. St. Supp. 1924, §§ 19867al-19867a36), on the ground that this act, as construed, applied, and attempted to be applied against the plaintiffs, is contrary to and in violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of the plaintiffs’ right to engage in…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boynton v. Fox West Coast Theatres CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Florida Realty, Inc. v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API