Legal Opinion
Umstead v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided September 13, 1984No. C-83-1168-D, C-83-1310-DPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HIRAM H. WARD, Chief Judge.
There are six motions before the Court, three pending in each of these cases. Common questions of law and fact permeate these cases and only plaintiff identity distinguishes the motions in one case from those in the other. While each motion has received individual consideration, the Court will, in the interest of judicial economy, rule on all motions in this Memorandum Opinion and Order. 1
Defendant Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc. (Durham Hosiery) moves in both actions to dismiss Count IV of the Complaints (October 31, 1983, December 21, 1983)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. G. Cecil Hartley, Travis Dell and Treasure Isle, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- D'Iorio v. AdonizioDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Kaufman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lindner v. Durham Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
- VAN DORN CO., CENT. STATES CAN. CO. v. HowingtonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- Bergen v. RothschildDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Tryco Trucking Co. v. Belk Store Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.