Legal Opinion
VAN DORN CO., CENT. STATES CAN. CO. v. Howington
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 24, 1985No. C85-1327APublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BELL, District Judge.
On May 6, 1985, the plaintiff Van Dorn Company, Central States Can Co. Division (hereinafter Central States) filed the above-entitled action against Texas Can, Inc. (hereinafter Texas Can) and three of its officers. The plaintiff alleged a cause of action based upon Title IX, § 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, commonly known as the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (hereinafter RICO). In addition, the complaint, as amended on July 14, 1985, asserted claims under Ohio law in which plaintiff contends defendants…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- NL Industries, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1986
- Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Girgis v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Gotham Print, Inc. v. American Speedy Printing Centers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.