Legal Opinion

State v. McLeod

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1964No. 37465PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

In the Massiah case, the defendant, after being indicted for violating the federal narcotics law, retained a lawyer, pleaded not guilty and while free on bail made incriminating statements in an automobile to a confederate who had decided to co-operate with the government. Those statements were overheard by a government agent by means of a radio hidden in the automobile and, over his objection, were used against the defendant at the trial.

In the majority opinion by Mr. Justice Stewart it is stated (84 S. Ct., 1199, 1203):

“We hold that the petitioner was denied the basic protections of that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald Roy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. People v. McCrarySupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. Lokos v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. State v. McCorgarySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API