Legal Opinion

Eichelsbach v. Harding

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1958No. 29869PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHES, Acting Presiding Judge.

Action for injunctive relief.

Defendants have appealed from the decree; (1), permanently enjoining and restraining them from maintaining a fence along the sides and rear line of their lot; (2), mandatorily ordering them to remove said fence; (3), permanently enjoining them from erecting any fence along the sides or rear line of their property without the written approval of the trustees of the subdivision in which their property is located.

The controversy arose over the alleged violation of a restrictive covenant prohibiting the erection of fences along the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HaimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Barnhart v. RipkaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Hribernik v. Reorganized School District R-3Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Pierce v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Harris v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Dierberg v. WillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Lake Development Enterprises, Inc. v. KojetinskyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Gibbs v. CassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Perseverance Common School District No. 90 v. HoneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API