Legal Opinion

Foster v. Hart Consolidated Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1912No. 7442PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Teller District Court.—Hon. Charles Cavender, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GabberT

On behalf of plaintiffs in error, the main point upon which they base their contention that the judgment is erroneous and should be reversed, is, that the statutory provisions involved and relating to non-producing mines are unconstitutional. Incidentally, at least, they contend that these provisions in so far as they relate to the assessment of producing mines, are, also, unconstitutional, and we shall consider that question first, as, to some extent, the constitutionality of the act relating to non-producing properties depends thereon.

The act of 1887 provided that a certain per cent, of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Iron Silver Min. Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  2. Pilgrim Consolidated Mining Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Idaho Telephone Company v. BairdIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ruark v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 37Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  3. Tallon v. Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  4. Rico Argentine Mining Co. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  5. MacLaren v. Ferry CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API