Legal Opinion
Rico Argentine Mining Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 13, 1963No. Civ. A. 6973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, District Judge.
I. The Pleadings and Issues.
The action herein is instituted pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1) seeking refund of ad valorem taxes paid to the County of Dolores under protest. The substantive remedy here invoked is a Colorado statute which authorizes in certain limited circumstances an action against the County to obtain refund of the taxes paid. This section, C.R.S.1953, 137-12-15 (Perm.Supp. 1960), 1 renders the County responsible for refund where the taxes are illegal, erroneous, or illegal due to erroneous assessment, improper levying, or clerical error. It may…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BrowningSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- First National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Percy Bland v. Robert McHannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Arvis E. Whitman, Sheriff and Ex-Officio Tax Collector, Bienville Parish, LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Kistner v. MillikenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- Southland Mall, Incorporated v. GarnerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Evangelical Catholic Communion, Inc. v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.