Legal Opinion
Schieber v. City of Mohall
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 1936No. File No. 6399PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
According’ to the complaint:
“The City of Mohall created a sewer district and a watermain district for the City — each district covering the incorporated limits. Improvement warrants were issued, and the sum of $29,325.00 remains unpaid, all past due except the sum of $550.00. All that can be realized from the balance of the assessment does not exceed the sum of $2,500.00. Nothing ‘can ever become available to said fund to apply on the principal of said warrants or any part of them.’ The warrants for the water system amounted to $34,500.00. Judgment was entered against the City in the United…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Carlson v. City of HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Fort Worth v. BobbittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CHARTIER REAL ESTATE COMPANY v. ChafeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Megarry Bros. v. City of St. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
- Marks v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- G. W. Jones Lumber Co. v. City of MarmarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.