Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Roe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The decree of the surrogate is reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the claimant’s claim of $5,000 is allowed, with interest thereon from March 21, 1931. The court reverses the findings of fact made by the surrogate as follows: 1. That S. Wallace Roe endeavored in the instrument hereinafter set out in the new finding of fact No. 2, to make a testamentary disposition of part of his property contrary to law. 2. That the said instrument was not coupled with other evidence sufficient to establish claimant’s claim. 3. That the services rendered by claimant to S. Wallace Roe were an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of RoeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of BarkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API