Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Roe
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 8, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Schenck, S.
Upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of the executrix herein, the validity of a claim against the decedent’s estate was presented and tried. This claim is based upon a written instrument executed by the testator in words and figures as follows:
“ Oct. 14th, 1926.
“ For a valuable consideration, I owe, Agnes J. Welch of 290 Lark St., Albany, N. Y., the sum of $5000, without interest, which is due and payable, in the event of my death.
“ In witness whereof, I have affixed my signature to this declaration.
“ S'. WALLACE ROE.
“ Signed sealed & delivered in presence of
“ H. W.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Govin v. . De MirandaNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Holmes v. . RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Claim of Gallagher v. Estate of BrewsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Blanshan v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Blanshan v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Estate of Hamlin ex rel. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Hamlin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932