Legal Opinion
Slagen v. Marwill
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy A. Graves, J.
The defendants Lawrence Marwill, M. D. and William E. Pickett, M. D. have moved for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 on the ground that the above-entitled action is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations and on the ground that as to the defendant Pickett he was not properly served with process.
The court will first consider whether the defendant Pickett is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this court. It appears from the affidavits submitted by the parties that the facts concerning the service of a summons on the defendant Pickett are undisputed. The defendant Pickett was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Green v. Morningside Heights Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Ives v. DarlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Monko v. St. John's Queens HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Nolan v. Ohio Medical ProductsNew York Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Conforti v. Beekman Downtown HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Cestaro v. MacKellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1977
- M. Prusman, Ltd. v. Ariel Maritime Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Close v. Upstate Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976