Ives v. Darling
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
That service of the summons had not been made upon the defendant was the ground of the motion. The process server made an affidavit of personal service of the summons upon this defendant. The defendant did not appear or answer. Thereupon judgment in regular form was taken by default. When this motion was made it appeared, if we accept the facts as presented by the plaintiff, that the form of the so-called personal service was as follows: The process server went to the home of the defendant; her husband came to the door; the process server told the husband his errand and was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hiller v. . B. and M.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Davison v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- O'Connell v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDonald v. Ames Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Green v. Morningside Heights Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Wiener v. RavekesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Shedlin v. State Tax CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Slagen v. MarwillNew York Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.