Legal Opinion

Lochore v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1917No. 13709PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ralston, J., entered May 22, 1916, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for damages through the removal of lateral support.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered upon the sustaining of a challenge to the sufficiency of the testimony, in an action brought to recover damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained in the original grading of a street. The pertinent facts may be briefly stated as follows: Appellants are the owners of three lots abutting upon the west side of Arrowsmith avenue, Seattle. Arrowsmith avenue is parallel to and one block west of Rainier Boulevard, and on a hillside above the Boulevard. In January, 1914, the city graded and improved Rainier Boulevard according to certain plans and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Seal v. Puget Sound Loan & Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Farnandis v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Jorguson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kuhr v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Allbin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fenton v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Clark v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Fenton v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API