Fenton v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs Fenton and wife seek recovery of damages claimed as the result of injuries inflicted upon their lots 9 and 10, of block 36, Gilman's Addition to Seattle, by the city's alleged unreasonable and negligent establishing and physical construction of the original grade of the street upon which the lots front. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for King county sitting with a jury, resulted in verdict and judgment denying to the Fentons recovery in any sum, from which they have appealed to this court.
The claims of error necessary to here notice relate only to instructions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Firemen's Fund Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Schuss v. City of ChehalisWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Allbin v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Lochore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Milwaukee Terminal Railway Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wandermere Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Hagen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Clark v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Blankenship v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1931