Warden v. S. Pasadena Realty & Improvement Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. Irving McKenna, and Catherine A. McKenna, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant John R. Leahy.
The complaint states a cause of action against the defendants to quiet alleged title of the plaintiff Grace P. Warden, to a tract of land described therein as lot 4, tract 246, in the city of South Pasadena, as per map recorded in Map Book 15, page 18, records of the County of Los Angeles. C. P. Warden has no interest in the action except as the husband of his coplaintiff.
The defendant, John R. Leahy, answered, denying that the plaintiffs are the owners of the property, or that his claim thereto is without right,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Landregan v. PeppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Severy v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Kitts v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Alameda Macadamizing Co. v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stuart v. FoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- McPherson v. MoneganMontana Supreme Court · 1947
- Sutton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Speer v. BlaskerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.