State v. Crandall
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
HANDLER, J.
'Defendant, Richard Crandall, was convicted of aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault, and endangering the welfare of a child. At his trial, the child victim testified via closed-circuit television, a procedure authorized by a recently-enacted statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-32.4. A stated purpose of the statute is to protect young victims of criminal abuse from the effects of testifying in open court in the presence of the accused. This appeal challenges the constitutionality of that statute. We are asked to determine whether the procedure…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. J.Q.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Felix v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. D.R.H.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.