Legal Opinion

In re Disbarment of Walkey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1899No. 3885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original Proceedings. Preliminary Question of Jurisdiction.

1Per curiam

By rule duly entered, the attorney general was directed to institute this proceeding against the respondent. In compliance with this order, an information was filed, and respondent ruled to show cause, within a time specified, why he should not he disbarred for the gross unprofessional conduct charged. Thereafter, and on the day the rule was entered, the clerk of this court mailed him, in a sealed envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to his place of residence in this city certified copies of the complaint, upon which the *162proceedings were originally based, the information, and rule to show…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. People ex rel. Mulford v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Beene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  4. Montelius v. AthertonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  5. Breed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Minnesota Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. In Re CravenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  3. Ex Parte LathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. EllisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API