Legal Opinion

Cline v. Hullum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1967No. 41108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to by name or collectively as defendants, have *154appealed from a- judgment recovered by plaintiff in an action brought to enforce specific performance of a contract for purchase and sale of real property.

Plaintiff’s action was based upon a written contract, executed by defendants on March 8, 1963, under which defendants agreed to convey a described tract (approximately 31 acres) for consideration of $3,000.00 per acre under other conditions not important here. The petition alleged plaintiff’s performance of conditions precedent, tender of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Powell v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Harrell v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Whale v. PearsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Britton v. AbsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of CrowlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Matter of Estate of CrowlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API