Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Cogswell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1914No. 11914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered November 11, 1913, dismissing an action for an injunction, after a trial on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

— This action was brought by the appellants to enjoin the respondents from interfering with a pipe line conveying water from a spring, on premises owned by the respondents, to a dwelling house, barn, and outhouses on premises owned by the appellants. The case was tried to the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the trial, the court dismissed the action. This appeal followed.

The facts are not disputed, and are substantially as follows : The appellant H. H. Cogswell is the son of the re*316spondents Morton Cogswell and wife. In the year 1894, Morton Cogswell was the owner of a half section…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. HagerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1870
  2. Schumacher v. BrandWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Vermont Central Rail Road v. Estate of HillsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  4. Cogswell v. CogswellWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. HennesseyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hubbard v. GrandquistWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wreggitt v. PorterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Zainey v. LindeWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Davison v. Columbia Lodge No. 8Washington Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API