Legal Opinion
People v. Colombo
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1927No. Docket No. 1379PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
— Defendant was convicted of maintaining a nuisance in violation of the "Wright Act (Stats. 1921, chap. 80, p. 79) and section 21 of the Volstead Act (U. S. Comp. Stats., § 10138%jj). The information as amended charged in part as follows:
“The said Joseph Colombo on the 16th day of September, ... at Martinez, . . . did then and there unlawfully maintain a common nuisance, to-wit: a place situated on Ferry Street, adjoining and fronting on lots 1 and 2, Block 319, and on said lots 1 and 2, Block 319, as the same are delineated and designated on that certain map entitled “Map of the Original and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Barker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- State v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. FrankovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. LocurtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929