State v. Harris
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,936 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT LEE HARRIS JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies only when the accused is compelled to make a testimonial communication that is incriminating. 2. The procedural safeguards adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 467, 86 S. Ct. 1602,
16 L. Ed. 2d 694
(1966), protect individuals from the inherent compulsions of the interrogation process. 3. A statement is…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. McNealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025