Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 31, 2025No. 125936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,936 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT LEE HARRIS JR., Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution applies only when the accused is compelled to make a testimonial communication that is incriminating. 2. The procedural safeguards adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 467, 86 S. Ct. 1602,

16 L. Ed. 2d 694

(1966), protect individuals from the inherent compulsions of the interrogation process. 3. A statement is…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McNealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API