In Re the Conduct of McNabb
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMON’D, Justice.
Following a formal hearing at which respondent, McNabb, was represented by counsel, a grievance- committee of the Alaska-Bar- Association found respondent guilty of professional misconduct in several particulars and recommended that he be suspended from the practice of law for 180 days. Since respondent has not petitioned this court for review -of the proceedings, findings' and recommendations of the committee, ,as he yvas privileged to do - under the Rules of the Alaska Bar Association, 1 it is incumbent upon this court to “issue * * * an order of dismissal, reprimand,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Clark v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- In Re WellsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WiederholtAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- In RE McGRATHAlaska Supreme Court · 2011