Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Thek

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1988No. 1693PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellant, Fred Thek, Jr., appeals from judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction of statutory rape, rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, incest, corruption of minors, and terroristic threats. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Appellant contends on appeal that: (1) trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance; (2) the trial court erred as a matter of law in its instruction to the jury based upon the jury’s question concerning the forcible compulsion element of the charge of rape; 1 (3) the charges against the appel lant should have been…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. SeeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. FrazerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. State of Minn. Ex Rel. Hove v. DoeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. PowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API