United States v. Sowell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentCrawford, Judge
I respectfully dissent because the majority does not examine the context in which this issue arises, mixes findings with sentencing evidence, neglects the burdens that are placed on the parties at various stages of the trial, and fails to analyze the standard of review.
Perhaps most importantly, this decision again raises a fair question regarding the extent to which courts-martial are to be tried according to established rules of law and then evaluated on appeal according to those same rules. In what has become a familiar theme of late,11 again must question how we can expect the Rules for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.