Legal Opinion

City Ice & Fuel Co. v. Bright

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1934No. 6451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Action for compensation for information and data- furnished ■ appellant- and used by •it as- the basis for purchase of certain ice .plants and businesses. The declaration was framed in two counts — the first alleging an express agreement for compensation;., and the second based on a quantum meruit under the common counts of assumpsit. The bill of particulars accompanying the common counts Was worded “for services, data, information relating .to the ice companies referred to in the first count” (the special eoiint)' “of plaintiff’s declaration furnished by plaintiff to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klebe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Miller v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Spencer v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Freehling v. KetchumMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Orcutt v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bernice Stevens v. Continental Can Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  2. South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1954
  3. Lakeshore Financial Corp. v. ComstockDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API