Legal Opinion

Freehling v. Ketchum

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case made from Newaygo. Assumpsit. Defendants had judgment below.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, 0. J.

Freehling sued the Ketehums under the common counts for goods sold, work and labor, money lent, money had and received, and account stated.

The record shows a bill of particulars (whether demanded or voluntarily furnished does not appear), which contained six separate charges for the aggregate value of goods furnished to sell on commission, on vari*300ous days mentioned, and three similar charges for goods sold on various days, giving the aggregate charge in each instance, but not giving the separate articles of goods thus furnished. No objection seems to have been taken before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. FreemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Smith v. HicksNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. People ex rel. Waring v. Monroe C. P.New York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Goodrich v. JamesNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  5. Tefft v. McNoahMichigan Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wright v. DickinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Knop v. National Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. City Ice & Fuel Co. v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  4. Tanner v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sogge v. SchwartzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API